YTD: 4-2 ATS
Miami @ NY Jets +2.5 (betcom)
This looks like the biggest sucker bet of the week to me. So I must be a sucker then because there is no way Miami is not going to cover 2.5 against the Jetless Jets. I know, I know, the Texans beat the Dolphins so the Jets have to win right? NO, the Dolphins and their dumb coaching staff were looking ahead I think and failed to adaquetly prepare themselves. The Jets on the other hand couldn't do anything right against the Redskins. The Jets have covered 4 of the last 5 meetings, but the here and now is what is important to me. The Dolphins will get back to basics and get Ricky the ball 30-35 times. The Jets and their aging offense in my oppinion just don't have the speed for this game.
Phins -2.5
Rams -3
Redskins +3
Chargers +3
Eagles -4
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 13, 2003 at 03:47 AM.]
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 14, 2003 at 04:00 AM.]
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 14, 2003 at 04:03 AM.]
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 14, 2003 at 11:23 AM.]
Miami @ NY Jets +2.5 (betcom)
This looks like the biggest sucker bet of the week to me. So I must be a sucker then because there is no way Miami is not going to cover 2.5 against the Jetless Jets. I know, I know, the Texans beat the Dolphins so the Jets have to win right? NO, the Dolphins and their dumb coaching staff were looking ahead I think and failed to adaquetly prepare themselves. The Jets on the other hand couldn't do anything right against the Redskins. The Jets have covered 4 of the last 5 meetings, but the here and now is what is important to me. The Dolphins will get back to basics and get Ricky the ball 30-35 times. The Jets and their aging offense in my oppinion just don't have the speed for this game.
Phins -2.5
Rams -3
Redskins +3
Chargers +3
Eagles -4
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 13, 2003 at 03:47 AM.]
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 14, 2003 at 04:00 AM.]
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 14, 2003 at 04:03 AM.]
[This message was edited by ChadC on September 14, 2003 at 11:23 AM.]